A comment is for a different reader
The tool had comments on under ten per cent of its lines and ninety pages of documentation built into the binary, and I'd argue that was one decision made for two very different readers.

The tool had comments on under ten per cent of its lines and ninety pages of documentation built into the binary, and I'd argue that was one decision made for two very different readers.

My R&D team's work only ever showed up in other people's numbers, so when delivery became the measure, they went. Making that work visible was my job.

The engineering argument for paying down tech debt almost never won. What got it funded was a promise, and it tended to be my name on the promise.

Blameless was meant to make it safe to tell the truth. Somewhere along the way it started to mean nobody did anything, and I'd quite like the first one back.

Agents made the doing cheap. What fourteen sessions cost is walking into each one cold, and the one head doing the walking.

The runner fleet cost $270 I didn't have, so it went off. The tests stayed on, and the savings came from everything I'd been paying for twice.

A Claude session ran for two days, stopped listening and got my hand-written code backwards. So I took it off the job, and asked for a proper handover first.

Management and engineering are two sides of the same coin, and far too many companies forget the engineering side has no cap.

I'd built this exact thing by hand, years ago, pixel perfect. So why was I sitting here shouting at a screen while a machine got it wrong three times?

I asked nine agent sessions to stop compiling for forty minutes. What came back read like a team of colleagues, and I haven't worked out what to do about that.
